🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives laid to rest in resting places at risk from coastal erosion argue that a lack of decision over how to tackle the problem is causing them unnecessary distress about the final resting places of their departed family.

A Looming Threat to Ancient Graveyards

The council have singled out three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being consumed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A recent report on the issue details a range of options, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and relocating them in safer sites. Authorities say it is for local people to decide how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. My parents wanted this to be their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates indicate at least part of one churchyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Past

A local business owner remembered a school trip to the nearby village of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the water, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that the deceased will just get washed out to the ocean. That is not the case. Individuals will collect remains as souvenirs and go grave robbing in search of treasures. That is completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that befell at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Further up the shoreline lies the burial plot of a former paratrooper killed while serving overseas. His mother said she lost sleep after learning her son’s final plot might one day be moved.

“It does trouble me to consider this won’t be his lasting home,” she said. “For us it’s an important site to visit.”

She believes, new burials should stop but says it is premature to disturb existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an timely resolution must be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Seeking Answers and Clarity

The lack of consensus over when and how to tackle the problem has resulted in bereaved families feeling exasperated and worried.

Some are calling for additional sea defences to delay the unavoidable loss and to permit funerals to proceed for now. Different voices argue the moment for moving graves is approaching.

“The situation is very emotional,” said one relative. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And all parties is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager confirmed the graveyards were owned and managed of the church authorities. “In the end it is down to them to choose the direction to take. Our role is here to help support them through that process with residents.”

He added there was time to consider all the options. “This concerns many years before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should be done yet. It requires good local conversations to discover the appropriate solutions for each community.”

The prospect of the loss of the historic sites was labeled one of “profound sadness for the area,” but church representatives also referenced a belief in life after death, providing a spiritual viewpoint on the physical loss of sacred ground.